Does Milk Cause Cancer?

Rumor: IGF-1 in Cow’s Milk Causes Breast Cancer

Rumor: IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor No. 1) in cow’s milk causes breast cancer in women and prostate cancer in men. IGF-1 is a carcinogenic hormone in milk, but in lower amounts in previously naturally produced milk. Since people use hormones to induce large-scale milk production in cows, the content of IGF1 in milk has increased several times to dozens of times. Of course, the risk of milk cancer is very serious.
Does Milk Cause Cancer?

No Evidence That IGF-1 Can Cause Cancer

The full name of the IGF-1 should called “Insulin-like growth factor I”, and the term “insulin-like growth factor 1” is inaccurate. IGF-1 is a protein with important physiological functions that is widely present in the human body. There are some epidemiological investigation shows that IGF-1 seems to associate with cancers such as prostate cancer. However, FDA and JECFA (Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives of the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) agreed that the relationship between IGF-1 and cancer is only a multifactorial correlation, and so far there is no evidence that IGF-1 is carcinogenic s reason.

The Increase in IGF-1 Caused by rbGH was Small

There are indeed reports of milk analysis that the use of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH) increases the content of IGF-1 in milk. But the increase in IGF-1 caused by rbGH was small, even smaller than the normal fluctuations of IGF-1 in milk. That is, a cow that uses rbGH will produce slightly higher levels of IGF-1 in milk, but the elevated levels may still be lower than many milks that don’t use rbGH. It is completely wrong to say that “the content has increased several times to dozens of times”.

Secondly, the content of IGF-1 in milk is very low. Regardless of whether the milk used rbGH or not, the amount of IGF-1 obtained from milk is negligible compared to the amount contained in the human body itself. In addition, after heating, digestion, and absorption, the IGF-1 in food reaches the human body and no longer has biological activity.

rbGH was Rejected Based on Animal Welfare Considerations

Some people will jump out and say, since the use of rbGH is safe, why is it currently not allowed in most countries? In fact, neither the European Union nor Canada raised any objection to the safety of milk using rbGH, but they believe that the use of rbGH harms the health of dairy cows, so the application for the use of rbGH was rejected mainly based on animal welfare considerations.

Conclusion

Rumors debunked. rbGH has no substantial effect on IGF-1 in milk; IGF-1 in milk does not pose a health hazard to humans.

References:

[1] Should dairy be recommended as part of a healthy vegetarian diet? Connie M Weaver Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89(suppl):1634S–7S.

[2] Report on the Food and Drug Administration’s Review of the Safety of Recombinant Bovine Somatotropin


source https://www.guokr.com/article/2289/Facebook

Instant Noodle Takes 32 Days to Detoxify?

Rumor 1: [Eat a pack of instant noodle requires liver detoxification for 32 days] The noodles are all deep-fried, and BHT is added to the oil. The scary thing is that the instant noodles are packed in a bowl. The material of the bowl is polystyrene. BHT, but when encountering high temperature during the brewing process, these substances will dissolve. The dangerous amount of polystyrene ingested by the human body per kilogram of body weight per day is 0.001 mg, and the dissolved amount of a bowl of instant noodles is 0.015 mg! Send it to your friends who love instant noodles.

Rumor 2: Mr. Zhang, a nutritionist from the Knott Nutrition Center of Zhejiang University, said that this statement of netizens is scientific and well-founded. But it is not that instant noodles are toxic, but the ingredients of instant noodles contain many substances that the human body does not need. "The liver is the detoxification organ of the human body. As long as the human body ingests unnecessary substances, it will be integrated and excreted by the liver, usually a cycle of 32 days. People eat instant noodles, fried puffed food and other foods, and those substances that the human body does not need are eliminated. Such a cycle is required for liver integration and excretion.”[1] 
Instant Noodle Takes 32 Days to Detoxify? 

How dangerous is BHT in Instant Noodle? 

The full name of BHT is 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol (Butylated Hydroxytoluene), which is an antioxidant. In food, it is widely used as an antioxidant for oils and fats. Edible oils all contain some unsaturated bonds, which will be oxidized in the air, resulting in what is commonly referred to as "halal flavor". In fact, oxidation has already occurred before the appearance of halal flavor, and halal flavor is only produced when certain oxidation products are abundant to a certain extent. There are some oxidation products that are harmful to the human body.

The role of BHT is to protect the oil by stepping forward to be oxidized first when the oil is threatened by oxidation. As a food additive, its safety has been extensively reviewed. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization's Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) set the tolerable daily intake of BHT at 0.3 mg per kilogram of body weight. For adults, that roughly equates to around 20 mg per day.

According to the current Chinese national standard for food additives, the dosage of BHT in different foods (including fried noodles) is generally 0.2 grams per kilogram of fat. According to the calculation of 100 grams of instant noodles per pack, usually with 20% oil content, if you eat 5 packs of instant noodles every day and eat them for many years, the BHT in them will not harm your health. Of course, BHT may also come from other foods, but if a person eats 5 packets of instant noodles a day, he probably won't be able to eat any other foods.

Whether large amounts of BHT affect health is indeed debated. But internationally, China, the United States and the European Union all allow its use. Nor is it the only antioxidant that can be used in oils. There is also a trend in the food industry to use other antioxidants in its place, such as vitamin E.

How Harmful is Polystyrene in Instant Noodle Bowls?

Another argument for the "toxicity" of instant noodles is that the bowl of instant noodles is made of polystyrene, which releases the monomer styrene when heated, and styrene is carcinogenic.

Harvard School of Public Health and other institutions published a comprehensive assessment of the potential health risks of styrene in the "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B" in 2002. The relevant conclusions are briefly described as follows:

Styrene is a widely used industrial raw material. Due to the development of modern industry, it is also present in the air, with typical values on the order of 1ppb (1ppb is equal to one part in a billion). In fact, it also occurs naturally in some foods, such as strawberries, beef, and peppers. A certain amount of styrene is also produced during the production of wine and cheese.

Many studies have been done on the safety of styrene. In terms of carcinogenicity, high doses of styrene have been shown to be carcinogenic in mice. This "large dose" is on the order of tens of milligrams per kilogram of body weight. Other health hazards, such as neurological and respiratory damage, also require large doses.

The place with the highest styrene content in the environment is the reinforced plastics factory. An epidemiological survey found that the incidence of lung cancer and respiratory tract cancer among factory workers was higher. Further analysis of the data, however, found that the increase came from workers at the plant who were least exposed to styrene. This suggests that the culprit behind the rise in cancer rates in the survey was not styrene, but something else.

The current experimental and statistical data do not support the conclusion that styrene is carcinogenic or harmful to health at conventional doses. However, due to the limitations of statistical data and experimental results, this possibility cannot be ruled out.

According to the common sense of "everything is poisonous, as long as the dose is sufficient", the difference between the intake and the safe amount needs to be paid attention to. The safe intake established by JECFA is 0.04 mg per kilogram of body weight per day. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration believes that this harmful dose of styrene is unlikely to be released from polystyrene packaging, so it allows it to be used in food. Europe and Japan also allow its use.

In China, the situation is more complicated. According to "Hygienic Standard for Polystyrene Resin for Food Packaging (GB9692-1988)" and "Hygienic Standard for Polystyrene Molded Products for Food Packaging (GB9689-1988)", polystyrene foamed plastic can be used to make disposable tableware. However, due to reasons such as "polystyrene may release harmful substances at high temperature", "causing white pollution" and "the quality of products of illegal enterprises cannot be guaranteed", "disposable foam plastic tableware including polystyrene tableware" "It has been included in the list of "eliminated products" since 2005. One region has implemented local ordinances banning such tableware. Considering the foreign situation, safety analysis and the benefits of using it, there have been calls to remove it from the list of obsolete products recently.

Styrofoam is only an option for instant noodle bowls. What material the instant noodle bowls on the market are made of currently needs to be judged according to the specific product. However, in any case, the rumor that "the dangerous amount of polystyrene ingested by the human body per kilogram of body weight per day is 0.001 mg, and the amount dissolved in a bowl of instant noodles is 0.015 mg" has no basis.

What are the "unwanted substances" in the seasoning

Zhang, a nutritionist at the Knott Nutrition Center of Zhejiang University, said, "Instant noodles contain a lot of substances that the human body does not need." The teacher Zhang did not explain the "what" substances the human body does not need in the instant noodle seasoning, but such a general statement is actually meaningless.

There is nothing special about the condiments of instant noodles. Like other convenience food accessories, they are mainly "conventional condiments" such as salt and oil, and some "food additives" such as flavors, pigments, antioxidants, and preservatives. Many people regard food additives as "substances that the human body does not need". From a nutritional standpoint, these substances are usually really unnecessary. But they each play a specific role in food. Antioxidants, for example, without which the oils in the dressing can go stale very quickly. The ingredients produced by different instant noodle manufacturers are not exactly the same, but as long as the ingredients meet the national standards, they will not harm health.

Most instant noodle ingredients contain a relatively large amount of salt. From the perspective of controlling salt intake, the seasoning of instant noodles is indeed unhealthy. Some people advocate not to add all the condiments, from the perspective of reducing salt intake is also reasonable.

Does the liver have a 32-day detoxification cycle?

There are various ingredients in food. Not only processed foods, but even "natural foods" contain ingredients that are "unwanted by the human body." There are several possibilities for such substances to enter the human body:

  • It is not absorbed and is directly excreted through the gastrointestinal tract. Such as insoluble dietary fiber, or solid food that does not dissolve in the gastrointestinal tract.
  • It is absorbed into the blood and metabolized into other substances in the liver, which is commonly referred to as "detoxification".
  • Products that are decomposed in the liver, or substances that are not decomposed, are mainly filtered by the kidneys and excreted in urine (a small amount is excreted in bile).
  • Part of it goes through the blood circulation to certain parts of the body, where it harms the normal functioning of the cells.

  • The first three situations are not harmful to health. Condition 4 is exacerbated if the intake is too high, exceeding the processing capacity of the liver and kidneys.

    For instant noodles, the fourth situation does not occur in qualified products and normal consumption. In the second and third cases, the rate of decomposition and excretion is determined by specific substances, rather than following the so-called "detoxification cycle" of the liver. That is to say, some substances are excreted quickly, and some substances are excreted relatively slowly. The rate at which a substance is excreted is usually measured by the time it takes to excrete 50% or 90% of the time. The time for the concentration to drop by half in a tissue is defined as the "half-life". If this time is short, such as a few hours or a day or two, the substance is considered "not accumulating". This is the case with all kinds of food additives. If this period is long, such as months or even years, the substance is considered to "build up" in the body. This is the case with many heavy metal pollutants.

    For example, the half-life of styrene is 8 to 9 hours based on metabolite concentrations in urine, and 2 to 4 days based on adipose tissue concentrations. The metabolic kinetics of BHT are complex, with a half-life between 9 and 11 hours after a single feeding to mice. Other food additives are roughly in a similar time frame. No matter which number you press, there will be no "32-day detoxification cycle."

    JECFA takes into account the health effects of the substance at the highest possible levels in the body when formulating safe intake levels. Therefore, as long as the safe intake standard is met, it can be considered that there is no impact on health.

    Conclusion

    Rumors smashed. Instant noodles itself is not a "healthy food". Its problems are that it is high in calories, has a single nutrient composition, and often has a lot of salt. As a convenience food, it should only be used as an emergency meal, not a regular staple. However, these rumors that "instant noodles are poisonous" are speculations used to create panic, and there is no scientific basis to support them.



    NASA: news that shocked all mankind?

    Has NASA discovered aliens? 

    Yesterday, a rumor was widely spread through Weibo and forums: NASA will hold a press conference the next day, announcing an "enough to shock all mankind" information". The text is often accompanied by a screenshot of NASA's website, which features the agency's press conference announcement. There were speculations for a while. Although many industry insiders speculated that the news that NASA is about to announce is related to the Chandler X-ray Telescope and may be an X-ray source, there are still many netizens who do not know the truth. the existence of man".

    However, as soon as the NASA news was announced, it was greeted with boos. It turned out that the agency just announced the discovery of a suspected young black hole. Disappointed Chinese netizens said the result was "unsatisfactory". However, how did the original quite powerful speculation of "shocking all mankind" come out and spread like wildfire?

    Diagram of the evolution and development of rumors

    Speculation from Italy

    The earliest source of the misinterpretation that NASA is going to release the new findings may be a report aired on November 14 by the Italian TV station Italia 1's news program Studio Aperto[1]. The report was titled "Tomorrow NASA will announce shocking news from outer space" (la nasa annuncia: domani novita choc dallo spazio; Tomorrow NASA will announce shocking news from space). However, this news just says that NASA will release information about the unusual object discovered by Chandler near Earth.

    Still, the news casts speculation on what's to come and steers the conversation toward "alien life." In the program, the producer also cited the "Apollo 11 dialogue" that has been circulating on the Internet but has never been officially confirmed, suggesting that astronauts have seen aliens. However, the news makes it clear in the final section that the above is just speculation, and the answer will only be known when NASA officially announces it, and ET fans may be disappointed because NASA's press conference may only be about a new The content of the celestial element.

    "Alien Fans" Appear

    On November 15, this news video was uploaded to Youku [2] and Tudou [3] by domestic netizens, with the title "Tomorrow NASA will announce a story that may shock all mankind. news," and explained that the Studio Aperto news program speculated that NASA may officially acknowledge the existence of extraterrestrial creatures or flying saucers in a statement.

    Subsequently, posts discussing NASA's press conference began to appear in forums such as Baidu's "2012 Truth Exploration Club" and "2012 Bar" discussing strange phenomena, aliens, and UFOs. In one of the posts, some netizens gave the "antecedents" of the press conference[4]:

    "According to a NASA official, since 2004, alien fleets have appeared successively near the sun. After years of observation, one of the super-giant alien spaceships is docked between Venus and Mercury, and the goal is coming towards the earth. , NASA urgently notified astrophysicists, philosophers, churches, and social research scholars around the world to secretly study the impact of this object on human society on Earth in 2008. At the same time, it secretly made contact with extraterrestrial visitors, in a series of observations and confirmations After there was no hostility. Then, after many and long discussions, NASA decided to make this important event public on November 15th.”

    By this time, though, such rumors were only spreading among aliens and mystery fans.

    Weibo is an amplifier

    As a special communication platform, Sina Weibo has become the most important medium for this rumor to spread. Relevant news first appeared on Sina Weibo around 11:30 on the 15th. At that time, many fans and users with few followers continuously reprinted the original text of the NASA press conference without translation or any interpretation. "WASHINGTON -- NASA will hold a news conference at 12:30 p.m. EST on Monday, Nov. 15, to discuss the Chandra X-ray Observatory's discovery of an exceptional object in our cosmic neighborhood."

    At 13:32, a subtitle group that translates mysterious events, aliens, and UFO-themed works announced through its official Weibo: Tomorrow, November 15th (November 16th, Beijing time) NASA A piece of news that may shock all mankind will be announced at 12:30 local time. [5]

    The news has been retweeted more than 5,000 times (as of press time), and bigger waves are to come. At 16:38 a few hours later, the official Weibo of a Newsweek published a message saying:

    The website of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) suddenly announced today that tomorrow, November 15, US time (November 16, Beijing time), it will announce a news that is enough to shock all mankind. [6]

    Links to relevant NASA pages are also distributed. It is worth noting that the "may" in the previous subtitle group rumors was replaced by "enough". The rumor has been retweeted more than 50,000 times and has more than 10,000 comments (as of press time).

    Although some netizens quickly pointed out the errors in this news: first, NASA announced the news of the conference as early as November 10, but it became "suddenly announced today" in the rumors; secondly, the original text of the NASA page The words "news enough to shock all mankind" did not appear in the text. Although the official Weibo account of the weekly magazine subsequently released a number of supplementary news, and made corrections and apologies for the words "news enough to shock all mankind", it did not change the result that the rumor was widely spread.

    The truth: At 12:30 local time on November 15th (1:30 am Beijing time on the 16th), NASA calmly told the masses who did not know the truth at a press conference: We did not find aliens, we found The celestial body is the first "young" black hole to be watched by humans and "grown" for 31 years, and it is really close, only about 50 million light-years away from us.

    References:
    [1] Italia 1Studio Aperto news video
    [2] Youku video
    [3] Potato Video 1 Potato Video 2
    [4] Post Bar
    [5] Official Weibo of the subtitle group
    [6] Official Weibo of a News Weekly

    Is Gender Prediction Test Real?

    Gender Prediction Test?

    There is a drug imported from the United States to detect the sex of the fetus - "Gender Prediction Test"?

    It can be operated at home, and the gender of the fetus can be determined in 10 minutes using a urine sample from a pregnant woman who is more than 6 weeks pregnant.

    If it is orange, it is a girl, and green is a boy. Although it is expensive (780 yuan), the accuracy rate can reach more than 90%? Really?

    Gender Prediction Test


    What is Gender Prediction Test?

    Namely IntelliGender's Gender Prediction Test [1] in the United States, is priced at $34.95 on the official website of the United States. In the FAQ on IntelliGender's official website, he claims to have an effective rate of 90%, but does not provide reliable data for this The following sentence follows: "Please keep in mind that this test is not 100% accurate. IntelliGender is committed to providing interesting products for expecting mothers during pregnancy. If you think that a false gender test result will cause any emotional stress, then our The product may not be right for you." IntelliGender's official response to "Can this test replace an ultrasound?" This test is just for parents-to-be to play. IntelliGender does not recommend that buyers make any financial, emotional or family planning decisions based on their test results. Asked "Will doctors recommend this test?" IntelliGender admitted that doctors generally don't recommend this test. IntelliGender's official website also mentions that polycystic ovary syndrome patients are most likely to be detected as "boys". Taking progesterone can also affect test results. [2]

    How did the "Gender Prediction Test" respond in the United States?

    In some mother-to-be forums in the United States, consumers in the United States have also reported their own use results. Netizen dawnklasen found that the first test was a boy. After drinking a glass of cranberry juice to acidify the urine, the sex of the child became a girl... [3] Chloe&kids tested both boys and gave it to the unpregnant A friend tested a boy (…), but at 16 weeks the ultrasound turned out to be a girl. Tamara said she had read about 1,000 user reports of the device and found that the accuracy rate was about 50% - about the same as flipping a coin. [4]

    In fact, the thin camel of the Squirrel Club just cracked the rumors a few months ago, but it made a comeback. [5] Thin Camel also verified the feedback of American consumers in the article——

    I searched the FDA website and found a relevant piece of information. It is actually in the adverse reaction report of MAUDE, the device experience database of manufacturers and users. It turned out that a person had burned his arms and hands for some reason while using this stuff, only to find out that the package and instructions didn't say what was inside at all. Almost a three-in-one product. 

    Someone asked about this earlier. The next few sisters showed a high scientific spirit. One said she could not find a theoretical basis. The second also said that he could not find theoretical support on the website of this thing and planned to consult his midwife. The third person went to search for articles published by others and found that the error rate of this thing is very high (up to 50%). The fourth one seems to be an insider, saying that the company has already had a lot of lawsuits.

    Is it safe to use a urine test for gender?

    It claims to be able to determine the sex of the fetus by detecting hormone levels in the urine of pregnant women. It is true that the levels of various sex hormones in fetuses of different genders are different. However, when this difference is reflected in the urine of the pregnant mother, it will be covered by the fluctuation of the pregnant mother's own sex hormone level. unstoppable.

    Tests that actually determine the sex of the fetus include ultrasonography, chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and more. Although it is true that researchers use maternal blood or urine to predict fetal sex, these generally require expensive tests in laboratories with specialized equipment. [6] Tests that can reliably test for gender in ten minutes at home have not yet been developed.

    On IntelliGender's US official website, there is also a "Gender Prediction Method from Ancient China". Legend has it that a 700-year-old scroll was found in a Chinese tomb, which records how to use your age and the month of conception. To predict the age of the baby - if you have a dark birth in December at the age of 25, it is a boy. [7] You see, instead of spending a lot of money to buy that rather dubious test kit, it’s better to play this test math for free on his website. Anyway, the results won’t be too far apart. It’s all three words: unreliable.

    Conclusion

    Rumors debunked. IntelliGender's official website has repeatedly emphasized: don't take me seriously, and don't take me seriously. Also, please keep in mind that gender identification for non-medical purposes is expressly prohibited in China.

    References:
    [1] IntelliGender’s Gender Prediction Test
    [2] IntelliGender FAQ
    [3] I THINK I FOUND OUT HOW INTELLIGENDER WORKS!
    [4] Has anyone got mixed results with Intelligender?
    [5] Pregnant women's urine test to know the sex of the fetus? Gender Prediction Test is a liar
    [6] Boy or Girl
    [7] Chinese birth calendar

    Mozart's Music can improve children's IQ?

    With the slogan "Don't let the child lose at the starting line", the dazzling prenatal education products justifiably took money out of the pockets of the expectant mothers and fathers. The world-famous "Mozart effect" - improving children's IQ, making parents overexcited. Let me tell you, these are just bullshit.  

    Rumor: Mozart's music, as prenatal music, can improve children's IQ.
    Mozart Effect

    Source: In October 1993, Frances Rauscher (Frances Rauscher) of the University of California published a paper in the famous "Nature" magazine [1], listening to Mozart music can improve students' IQ. The following year, The New York Times praised Mozart's music based on this [2]. Astute businessmen smelled the benefits and began to promote the magic of the Mozart effect. The music CDs sold in audio-visual stores are the proof. It reads: As long as mothers-to-be listen to these music, they can subtly promote the intellectual development of the fetus in the womb. Since then, a whirlwind of Mozart effect has been blowing around the world. 

    The truth

    First, Rauscher's experiment was not conducted on expectant mothers or children at all, and it cannot be concluded that music can improve children's IQ; It's not about half a dime; finally, after Rauscher's study, most of the research conducted by other scientists has basically poured cold water on this miraculous effect. "The enhancement of cognitive ability by Mozart music is limited, and does not improve IQ or general reasoning ability." Even better, involving only a single type of task, which can be explained by neuropsychological methods, namely "enjoyment of awakening". In short, this is a bit similar to "working together with men and women is not tiring", the key is whether you can enjoy the process - the enjoyer, the more benefit.

    So, can the baby in the womb hear the sound? What happens? In theory, at least in the first half of pregnancy, the fetus is unlikely to hear the sound. Because until the 20th week of pregnancy, the development of the inner ear is not basically complete. [4] The effect of music on the fetus is also uncertain until the sound can be heard. Scientists played music to pregnant mothers over 28 weeks and found that there was no clear relationship between the fetal heartbeat, the way the fetus moved and the sound. [5] The legend that "listening to Mozart can improve children's IQ" has not been scientifically tested.

    Although numerous studies have shown that letting children listen to music does not confer any cognitive advantages. But in fact, there are still many parents who really believe that listening to music makes their children smarter.

    Conclusion

    Rumors debunked. Enjoy the joy of music, and forget about raising your IQ.


    References:

    [1] Rauscher F.H., Shaw G.L., Ky K.N. Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.(14 October 1993)

    [2] New York Times

    [3] Steele K.M., Bella S.D., Peretz I., Dunlop T., Dawe L.A., Humphrey G.K., Shannon R.A.,Kirby J.L., Olmstead C.G. Prelude or requiem for the 'Mozart effect'? Nature 400, 827-827 (26 August 1999)

    [4] "Seven-year planning textbook - Histology and Embryology" published by People's Medical Publishing House

    [5] a)SONTAG L.W., STEELE W.G., LEWIS M. The foetal cardiac response to environmental stress. Human Devlop. 12, I (1969).b) Jean- Pierre LECANUET and Benoist SCHAAL. sensory performances in the human foetus: a brief summary of research.Intellectica, 2002/1,34,pp.29-56

    Is Coke a spermicide?

    What? It turns out that Coke was originally a spermicide! Later, it became a popular drink because of its good taste! ——This news was frequently forwarded thousands of times on Weibo, and everyone commented in a calm manner: No wonder they say that Coke has contraceptive function! Some people wondered silently: My husband and I both love to drink Coke, but our children can play soy sauce. What is going on?

    Rumor: It turns out that Coke was originally a spermicide! Later, it became a popular drink because of its good taste! ——This news was frequently forwarded thousands of times on Weibo, and everyone commented in a calm manner: No wonder they say that Coke has contraceptive function! Others asked: What about Pepsi? Some people even wondered: My husband and I both love to drink Coke, but our children can play soy sauce. What is going on?
    Is Coke a spermicide?

     

    A cold joke from weibo

    Wow, this is such a fresh rumor. It's less than a month since it was fresh. In fact, this is a cold joke posted on his Sina Weibo on October 12, 2010 by "Science of Bullshit" [1]. The original paragraph is as follows:

    Due to an allergy to rubber products, nineteenth-century American pharmacist John Pemberton developed a dark-brown, sperm-killing spray-on contraceptive for men. One night in bed, when he took safety measures, he found that his wife was inconvenient, so he had to ask her to solve the problem for him in another way. Afterwards, his wife said that his potion tasted very special. Two years later, John sold his formula to Isa Keidler, who soon formed The Coca-Cola Company. "


    We specifically contacted the original author "Science of Bullshit", who said that this joke came to his mind when he saw the entry for Coke on Wikipedia. John Pemberton, an American pharmacist, is indeed a man, and he was the first to invent the Coke formula. But the spermicide is pure fiction. The truth is, Atlanta had Prohibition, so he invented this non-alcoholic drink. [2]

    Nonsense Science is also surprised that its jokes are believed to be true by the public. After all, the reason for registering this account was to make it clear that the jokes in it were all fabricated. Unexpectedly, in the Internet circulation, the original author information was quickly lost, and people began to spread it as "truth". It can be seen that one of the most important factors for a rumor to become popular is to hit some kind of fear hidden in people's hearts.


    In fact, although the idea of cola killing sperm has been circulating for a long time, there is currently no reliable scientific evidence to support this claim. [3] Although Coke is not a healthy drink, it is by no means a "functional drink" for contraception.


    Conclusion

    Rumors debunked. Please stop spreading this news as the truth, let the bullshit be bullshit, and the scientific be science.


    References:

    [1] Bullshit Science

    [2] John Pemberton

    [3] Cola Spermicide

    Can cutting and shaving make hair thicker and darker?

     Rumor: Cutting and shaving can make hair thicker and darker.

     

    Can cutting and shaving make hair thicker and darker?

    The Truth

    For this rumor, there are really a few happy and some sad. People with less hair hope to increase their hair by cutting their hair often, and women who need to remove body hair worry that their body hair is getting thicker and darker. In fact, whether the hair is more or less, thick or thin, black or light, has nothing to do with whether you cut it or shave it, these are determined by genes and hormones [1]. The hair follicle, which directly affects the growth of hair, is hidden deep in the skin. It is only the surface shearing and will not affect the hair follicle, so it will not have any effect on the state of the hair [2].

    If this rumor is true, there will be no people bothering about baldness. Men who shave every day will gradually become big beards, which is not the case. The number of hairs is determined by the number of follicles, and cutting hair does not change the number of follicles. In addition, long hair will appear softer, and it will appear harder after cutting it, which is because of human illusion. A similar example is also bamboo, which can be bent when it is long, but it is difficult to bend it when it is cut short. As for the thickness, the part of the hair tip will be thinner than the part that just grew out due to friction for a period of time. The problem with color is similar. Exposure to sunlight can lighten hair color, making new hair appear darker. But these differences have nothing to do with the haircut itself.

    Conclusion

    Rumors Debunked


    References: